In chapters one through three of the Digital Disconnect by Robert McChesney, there was a lot of
information regarding how the internet and technology has changed the world. I
found the sections about the Celebrants and the Skeptics extremely interesting. They allowed the reader to see both sides of
this enormous entity that has taken over our world.
Now,
the question is do you side with the celebrants or the skeptics about how
beneficial technology and specifically the internet have been for society? Most
people would quickly respond by saying that technology has transformed our
world for the better, but I am a little hesitant when looking at the global
picture. I completely agree that my life is so much better with technology and
the internet in it; yet, there are many people and countries that do not have
the same opinion.
By 2020
there will be 22 billion devices around the world connected to the internet (p
2). That is truly astonishing that people around the world will be able to
connect so easily. Information will be spread quicker, communication will be
easier, and so many more amazing things, but the way information is spread
today I cannot see how we will be more informed with more people able to access
the internet. For example, the United States and Europe are both very well
connected to the internet and relatively curious as to what is happening with
each other. However, there are so many enormous things that we as Americans are
not exposed to. For instance the former Prime Minister of Italy, Silvio
Berlusconi, was and still is a media tycoon in Italy where he owns roughly 75%
of all media outlets. For the past 20 years he has been running the country to
his liking to make him more money and give himself more power. He does this
through his control over the media. Here is a great profile of Berlusconi
detailing all of his media involvement, scandals, jail sentences, illegal
activity, and much more. McChesney
states, “technology is as capable of being destructive as it is progressive” (p
10). This idea is crucial to the understanding of how powerful technology and
the internet is, because depending on who has the control, it can get taken
advantage of, and this is exactly what Silvio Berlusconi did.
This
idea of too much power is what the PEC tries to manage. Like the book says, “It
evaluates media and communication systems by determining how they affect
political and social power in society and whether they are, on balance, forces
for or against democracy and successful self-government” (p64). This is definitely
a great thing to have a check and balance system attached to technology, media,
and the internet because without it, things could get out of control. That is
why when asked if I think technology and the internet was beneficial I do agree
that it is, but I hesitate because I think the only way it can be good is with
some watching over and possibly restraint.
Another
interesting point of these chapters was how they discussed that social media
cites have actually led to an increased amount of loneliness (p11). This is
extremely interesting because I think most people would agree that Facebook seems
to be used, especially nowadays, to make your life look amazing and that you
have all of these friends and do all of these amazing and interesting things,
but in reality most of the time you are at home looking at another person's
glorified pictures on their Facebook. Thus, not everything is as great as it
appears. Overall, I am truly amazed at what technology and the internet were
able to accomplish, but I do think it is interesting how large the gap is
between the internet being truly beneficial and still problematic.
Great post and I want to talk a bit about the last paragraph. I recently read an article in a different class about an online gamer who lived what he thought was a great online life. He had tons of friends, a home, and a girlfriend who he eventually married..online. When interviewed, he spoke about how great his online life was and how much he enjoyed it. When he was asked to talk about how his online life compared to his real life, he basically explained that the amazingness of his online life made his real life seem less significant and left him with a sense of unhappiness because he believed that his virtual life would never be as great as his online one. Someone could say something similar about having 1,000 or so facebook friends online but only a few in reality. I cant really bring myself to agree with McChesney's point about the destructiveness of the internet because the internet alone can't do anything. It's the choices that we make and the way we use the internet that might make it destructive.
ReplyDeleteThat is a really interesting story! Your last statement is so true how it is up to us to make the choices about how we use the internet that determine its value. Just like the show "Catfish" how people today like you said, believe that they have a true relationship with people online, and they have never met this person yet. The internet can be cruel if you let it be.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete