"Anonymous is tired of corporate interests controlling the internet and silencing the people’s rights to spread information, but more importantly, the right to SHARE with one another. The RIAA and the MPAA feign to aid the artists and their cause; yet they do no such thing. In their eyes is not hope, only dollar signs. Anonymous will not stand this any longer."
This brings up the contrary idea that hackers can be good for society. I agree that hacktivist groups can be beneficial in that they work as a form of checks and balances for the internet. Because there are people who understand the internet as well, if not better than computer scientists that work for the government is actually comforting to me. With the powers of hackers, secrets such as the NSA files will no longer go unnoticed.
Another aspect of the internet worth noting is its addictive qualities. I grew up with the internet, and for me, it has grown from primarily a source of information, into a source of entertainment. There are endless videos, and games to entertain the casual web-surfer for hours on end. There are now actual social groups that meet on the internet and consider themselves tight groups of friends. For some of these people, internet social groups are just harmless entertainment, but many others are more comfortable with their online friends than their real life ones. Excessive internet use often interferes with relationships, work and school.
I think you raise an interesting point about striking a balance regulated internet policies and people's right to express themselves. While I value transparency in government internet policy as well, I also think that there is a point where some information should be kept secret from the public, even if it is being held in a forum that is generally understood to be public like the internet, such as in the example of the NSA files. I also saw some connections between your argument and the Winner article about the political aspects of technology. The internet is deeply politicized, and the power that hackers have reinforces its identity as a political force. As Winner suggested, technologies can be authoritarian or democratic. I think the internet is an ideal example of a technology that when controlled, represents authoritarian control but in its purest form, represents democracy.
ReplyDelete